Fitvids 1INSTD85BAR Weight Plates Review
Our verdict
The Fitvids 1INSTD85BAR Weight Plates set is priced at $152.98 with a 4.0-star average across 297 reviews, the lowest rating of any plate covered here. With 0 units listed as bought last month, current demand looks weaker than the similarly priced Gikpal and XDDIAS 85-pound rubber sets.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Buyers specifically wanting a cast iron plate set rather than rubber-coated plates, and who are comfortable relying on an established 297-review history even though recent purchase activity isn't reflected in the current bought-last-month figure.
Skip if
Skip it if recent buyer momentum matters to you, since the listing shows 0 units bought last month versus 50-plus for the similarly priced Gikpal and XDDIAS rubber sets, both of which also hold a higher star rating.
- Material Cast Iron
- Weight 2 Pounds
- Priced 119% above the category median ($69.99 across 114 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.0/5
4.0 average across 297 owner ratings
-
Popularity2.9/5
297 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other home gym and fitness equipment we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Some lifters have a strong preference for cast iron over rubber, either for the feel on a bar or for a lower profile per pound. The Fitvids 1INSTD85BAR Weight Plates set, priced at $152.98, is built from cast iron, distinguishing it from the rubber-coated 85-pound sets elsewhere in this comparison.
On price, it lands close to the Gikpal W01-85 at $169.99 and the XDDIAS 1001 at $159.99, both of which are rubber and both of which carry a 4.5-star rating. The Fitvids set, by contrast, holds a 4.0-star average across 297 reviews, noticeably lower than either rubber competitor, and it currently shows 0 units bought last month compared to 50-plus for both of those alternatives.
That combination of a lower rating and no recent purchase activity is worth weighing against the appeal of cast iron construction. The review count of 297 is respectable and suggests a decent track record, but the current numbers point to softer momentum than the other 85-pound-class sets in this lineup, which may be worth factoring in alongside personal material preference before checking out, especially for a buyer who has no strong loyalty to cast iron over rubber.
Pros
- Cast iron construction appeals to lifters who prefer the feel and lower bulk of iron over rubber-coated plates
- 297 reviews is a substantial sample, showing a long track record of purchases
- Priced at $152.98, below the $159.99 and $169.99 rubber alternatives in this comparison
- Currently listed as InStock, with no availability barrier to ordering
- The 1INSTD85BAR model name signals an 85-pound-class set, keeping it in the same weight bracket as its rubber competitors
Cons
- 4.0-star average is the lowest rating among the plate sets covered here, compared to 4.5 stars or higher for others
- 0 units bought last month suggests weaker current demand than the similarly priced Gikpal or XDDIAS sets
- No listed pieces or color specs make it harder to judge the exact plate breakdown before buying
- Cast iron plates are typically louder when racked or dropped compared to rubber-coated alternatives
Specifications
| Material | Cast Iron |
|---|---|
| Weight | 2 Pounds |
Performance notes
The listing names cast iron as the build material, which typically means a smaller diameter per pound than rubber-coated plates, since iron is denser. That can be an advantage for lifters stacking a lot of weight on a shorter bar sleeve. The model name includes 85BAR, hinting at an 85-pound-class set similar in scale to the Gikpal and XDDIAS options, though the listing doesn't confirm a total weight figure or piece count the way those other listings do. Without a confirmed piece count or per-plate breakdown, buyers should check the full listing for the exact weights included before assuming parity with the other 85-pound sets in this comparison. Cast iron plates generally hold up well over years of use, though they can be noisier than rubber when set down.
What buyers say
A 4.0-star average across 297 reviews is a workable score, but it's the lowest rating of any plate in this comparison, trailing the 4.5-star Gikpal and XDDIAS sets as well as the 4.7 and 4.8-star EVERYMATE fractional plates. The 0 figure for bought last month stands out most, since every other product in this group at a similar or lower price shows at least 50-plus recent purchases. That gap suggests the Fitvids set may have built its review base over a longer period without the same current buying momentum as its closest rubber-plate competitors, which is worth factoring in alongside the lower star rating.
More from Fitvids
Similar home gym and fitness equipment to consider
Frequently asked questions
Is the Fitvids 1INSTD85BAR made of cast iron or rubber?
The listing specifies cast iron. That sets it apart from the rubber-coated Gikpal W01-85 and XDDIAS 1001 sets in this comparison, both of which sit at similar price points but use a different plate material and carry a higher star rating.
Why does this set show 0 bought last month?
The listing currently reflects no purchases logged in the past month, unlike the Gikpal and XDDIAS sets, which each show 50-plus. That doesn't necessarily reflect long-term quality, since the product still holds 297 reviews, but it does suggest weaker recent momentum.
How does the rating compare to similarly priced plate sets?
At 4.0 stars, it trails the 4.5-star Gikpal W01-85 priced at $169.99 and the XDDIAS 1001 at $159.99, both close in price. Buyers prioritizing rating and recent demand may want to weigh those two rubber options against this cast iron set.