OPPSDECOR bench5779 Weight Bench Review
Our verdict
The OPPSDECOR bench5779 costs $209.98, more than double the price of the Marcy SB-10115 ($91.89), yet its 4.2-star average across 526 reviews sits below both the SB-10115's 4.6 stars and the Marcy JD-1.2's 4.4 stars. The bigger 63 x 50 x 65 inch footprint is the main thing you're paying for here.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Best for buyers who specifically need a larger-footprint bench, at 63 inches deep, 50 inches wide, and 65 inches tall, and who have the floor space in a garage or dedicated workout room to accommodate it, and don't mind paying a premium over smaller alternatives.
Skip if
Skip it if budget or rating is the priority. At $209.98 it costs well over double the Marcy SB-10115's $91.89, while posting a lower 4.2-star average across a smaller 526-review base, a combination that's hard to justify unless the larger footprint is a specific requirement.
- Material Alloy Steel
- Weight 31.2 Kilograms
- Dimensions 63"D x 50"W x 65"H
- Color RedCarbon
- Priced 50% above the category median ($139.97 across 94 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.2/5
4.2 average across 526 owner ratings
-
Popularity3.0/5
526 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other home gym and fitness equipment we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Think about a home gym with room to spare, not a cramped apartment corner. That's the setting the OPPSDECOR bench5779 seems built for. At $209.98, it costs more than double the Marcy SB-10115 ($91.89) and sits closer to the Body-Solid GHYP345's $295 price tag, positioning it as a mid-to-premium option in this lineup.
Its dimensions back up that positioning: 63 inches deep, 50 inches wide, and 65 inches tall, by far the largest footprint of the four benches compared here, and a 31.2-kilogram weight that suggests a sturdier, more substantial build than the lighter flat benches in this set. It's finished in a RedCarbon color scheme and currently shows InStock availability.
Where the price and size don't fully translate is into review sentiment. Its 4.2-star average across 526 reviews trails the Marcy JD-1.2's 4.4 stars, the Body-Solid GHYP345's 4.3 stars, and the Marcy SB-10115's 4.6 stars, despite those alternatives costing the same or less. Bought last month sits at 100+, in line with the JD-1.2 and the Body-Solid GHYP345's 50+, suggesting steady but unremarkable demand for a bench priced well above most of the field.
Pros
- Largest footprint in this comparison at 63 x 50 x 65 inches, suited to a dedicated workout room.
- 31.2-kilogram build is heavier and likely sturdier than the flat benches in this set.
- InStock availability means it ships without delay.
- 100+ units bought last month puts it on par with the Marcy JD-1.2 and ahead of the Body-Solid GHYP345's 50+.
- 4.2-star average across 526 reviews still lands above the 4.0 threshold, even if it trails the top performers here.
Cons
- At $209.98, it costs more than double the Marcy SB-10115's $91.89 while rating lower at 4.2 stars versus 4.6.
- 526 reviews is a smaller sample than the JD-1.2's 2,300 or the SB-10115's 5,200, making the average less battle-tested.
- Large 63 x 50 x 65 inch dimensions require significantly more floor space than compact flat benches.
- Priced close to Body-Solid GHYP345 ($295) territory without matching that bench's rating.
Specifications
| Material | Alloy Steel |
|---|---|
| Weight | 31.2 Kilograms |
| Dimensions | 63"D x 50"W x 65"H |
| Color | RedCarbon |
Performance notes
A 31.2-kilogram frame, close to the Body-Solid GHYP345's 32.15 kilograms, puts the bench5779 in heavier-duty territory than the sub-35-pound flat benches in this set. That extra mass typically means a more planted base under load, useful for pressing or rowing without the bench shifting. The 63 by 50 by 65 inch dimensions are the largest in this comparison by a wide margin, which suggests a bench built with additional attachments, a taller backrest, or a wider base rather than a simple flat pad. That size also means it needs meaningfully more clearance than the Marcy SB-10115's more compact 18 by 58 by 45 inch listed dimensions. For anyone training in a shared or multi-purpose room, that footprint is worth measuring against available space before buying, since this is not a bench designed to tuck into a small corner.
What buyers say
A 4.2-star average across 526 reviews is respectable but modest next to the other benches in this set. It's the lowest rating in this four-bench comparison, sitting below the Body-Solid GHYP345 at 4.3 stars, the Marcy JD-1.2 at 4.4 stars, and the Marcy SB-10115 at 4.6 stars, all at lower or comparable prices. The review count itself, 526, is also the thinnest sample among the four, which means the average carries somewhat less statistical weight than the SB-10115's 5,200-review base. Bought last month sits at 100+, matching the JD-1.2's pace. Taken together, the pattern suggests a bench with a loyal but modest buyer base rather than one building the kind of broad, high-volume track record seen elsewhere in this category.
More from OPPSDECOR
Similar home gym and fitness equipment to consider
Frequently asked questions
Is the OPPSDECOR bench5779 worth its $209.98 price?
It's priced for buyers who want the largest footprint in this comparison, at 63 x 50 x 65 inches, and a heavier 31.2-kilogram build. But its 4.2-star average across 526 reviews trails cheaper options like the Marcy SB-10115 at 4.6 stars, so the premium buys size more than rating.
How does the bench5779 compare to the Body-Solid GHYP345?
The Body-Solid GHYP345 costs $295, more than the bench5779's $209.98, but posts a higher 4.3-star average, though from a similar 175-review sample versus 526. Both sit in the premium tier of this comparison, well above the Marcy benches on price.
What are the dimensions of the OPPSDECOR bench5779?
It measures 63 inches deep, 50 inches wide, and 65 inches tall, and weighs 31.2 kilograms. That's the largest footprint of any bench in this comparison, closer in scale to a multi-function setup than to the compact flat benches from Marcy.